↓
 

TransverseAlchemy

Visual Curiosities: Psychedelia, Sex, Drugs and other Decadent Art. Dedicated to Those who Suckle at the Teats of Chaos.t

  • Home
  • FleshandRelics
  • CVKustoms
  • Good Karma Productions

Monthly Archives: October 2015

George Hendrik Breitner

TransverseAlchemy Posted on October 9, 2015 by CharlieJune 25, 2016

George_Hendrik_Breitner_-_photo_04

George Hendrik Breitner was born in Rotterdam in 1857. He enrolled in the Art Academy in The Hague in 1876, later working as an art teacher at the Leiden academy Ars Aemula Naturae. Expelled from the academy in 1880 for misconduct, he moved into landscape artist Willem Maris’s studio; during this period he was accepted into the Dutch art society, institution and studio Pulchri and worked on the
Panorama Mesdag. But Breitner felt restricted by the Hague School, and gradually distanced himself from it as he leaned further towards the growing impressionist movement. He preferred working-class models: laborers, servant girls and people from lower-class neighborhoods; he saw himself as ‘le peintre du peuple’, the people’s painter. He soon developed an association with the Dutch Tachtigers (“Eighty-ers”) literary group that championed impressionism and naturalism against romanticism.
Conservative critics called Breitner’s style ‘unfinished’.

George_Hendrik_Breitner_-_Het_Rokin_te_Amsterdam 2739-(mk)_large  Breitner-George-Early-morning-Sun George_Hendrik_Breitner_-_Het_Damrak_te_Amsterdama_view_of_the_prins_hendrikkade_with_the_schreierstoren,_amsterdam-large

In the early months of 1882, Breitner came into contact with Vincent van Gogh, who was introduced by his brother Theo. The pair sketched together in the working-class districts of The Hague; Breitner was motivated to do so because he regarded himself as a painter of the common folk, while Van Gogh was more intent on recruiting models. It is likely that Breitner introduced van Gogh to the novels of Émile Zola and the cause of social realism.
Breitner was hospitalised in April. Van Gogh visited him in hospital, but Breitner did not return the visits when van Gogh himself was hospitalised two months later and they did not meet again until the following July when van Gogh was on the verge of leaving The Hague and Breitner spending more time in Rotterdam. van Gogh gave Theo a less than flattering account of Breitner’s paintings as resembling mouldy wallpaper, although he did say he thought he would be all right in the end.
In 1886, Breitner moved to Amsterdam and entered the Rijksakademie, but it was quickly apparent that he was “…far beyond the level of education offered there.” He recorded the life of the city in sketches, paintings and photos, sometimes creating several pictures of the same subject from different angles or in different weather conditions.
Two years after van Gogh’s death, Breitner wrote that he did not like van Gogh’s paintings:”‘I can’t help it, but to me it seems like art for Eskimos, I cannot enjoy it. I honestly find it coarse and distasteful, without any distinction, and what’s more, he has stolen it all from Millet and others.”

0yUsuAppU902KI4nA_BgO7UgoF56bXYczvr3E4sbx0Auu8zeRVxEK41v3Se-DsuKJjoWpOBLXjYIqoaC69KDfIv8GtI=s1920tumblr_niqjsz01ws1qd3c2yo1_1280RP-F-K89479D19DVsn8zRORoZ4nepalPWPm8f1Yy5-4XKmvhNWrcNST-DtxSC1wcTf-C4ZaZlz7-gcQZI14TjzxcvImUdFnt2An5Q=s1920

 

By 1890, cameras became affordable, and Breitner saw photography as a much better instrument to satisfy his ambitions. He became very interested in the movement and illumination in Amsterdam and soon mastered the new medium: today he is often referred to as one of the early pioneers of “street photography”. His preference for cloudy weather conditions and his muted grey and brown palette likely resulted from his focus on photography. It has sometimes been assumed that Breitner took photographs simply as studies for his paintings, but most of the pictures have no bearing on his other works.

 

 

   George_Hendrik_Breitner_-_Meisje_in_witte_kimono_(Geesje_Kwak)

He often painted female nudes, but was criticized for painting them too realistically and the critics felt they “…did not resemble the common ideal of beauty”. In his own time Breitner’s paintings were admired by artists and art lovers, but often despised by the Dutch art critics for their raw and realistic nature.
Similarly, he photographed several nude models;  the motivation behind these pictures is obvious, and they lack the exploratory impulse of the photographs taken outside. One author states that “Free of classical or other narrative associations, these images were not intended to signal anything other than a specific desirable body in a particular room.”

liggend-naaktgeorge_hendrik_breitner_-_reclining_nude_-_google_art_projectA 239d5374739a

RP-F-K89515Breitner rarely commented on his photography. In his circles it was frowned upon for artists to use photographs; the painter’s observation and invention were much more highly valued than the use of a camera as mechanical drawing aid. In his book Korte geschiedenis der Hollandsche schilderkunst (a brief history of Dutch painting), published the year Breitner died, the prominent critic Albert Plasschaert wrote about Breitner’s art: “…in addition I believe that I can detect here and there the use of a camera (that danger).”
In fact the discovery that Breitner had been such a prolific photographer would only come 40 years after his death. In 1961 the Netherlands Institute for Art History (RKD) in The Hague received almost 2,000 negatives and 300 prints from Hein Siedenburg, the heir of the art gallery that represented Breitner in his final years.
By the time Breitner’s photographic activities actually became public the use of photography by painters was much more favorably regarded, and comments in the press were on the whole positive. If Breitner was concerned about the effect on his posthumous reputation, then it is likely that the negatives and prints were made public only after they no longer posed a threat to his status as a painter.

 

george-hendrik-breitner-seated-nude-1889-1915

Since that time several more groups of Breitner’s negatives and prints have surfaced. Approximately 2,850 negatives and prints are currently known, and of these three quarters are in the collection of the RKD. The remaining groups are housed in Leiden University Library, Amsterdam City Archives and the Rijksmuseum.
Breitner’s photographs continue to intrigue us to this day, 50 years since they were first discovered. Their number and diversity is so great that new insights can still be made and much remains to be said about his reasons for producing them, his motives for using them as well as his ‘manipulation’ of the photographic medium.

 

george-hendrik-breitner-1857-1923-sans-titre-1900_e tumblr_noz1eiacff1tp18cso1_500george-hendrik-breitner-marie-jordan-de-espaldas-1890-1910 george-hendrik-breitner-reclining-nude-1988 george-hendrik-breitner-reclining-nude-n-d-via-hyperallergic  H3X0QRY_O4CDSWxP5OlNw9H2D7KqQfefyvRfaHOK0xjIccqUkgHhXPILS89ne-A5BRngqKchYWaWEivPZdYp3JpVzQ=s1920 IVL9QVS5QFiDMMyNCFjPojRNZ-wfX8JdBD7UpkKUHzLHsEprjZ-vJ3pI087g4LH97E-3f3ApNsGF66IA71x3j9ZtHHk8=s1920   w-FJsZa20nhfwmBwZaU_TYWxTUju16tJaB05Pi6gKag56CsP2a4Zax1JBTLJzQcSuJScjs2Jfu9Y-elFSrMBOgmGTJk=s1920

Georg_Hendrik_Breitner_-_Staand_naakt_1893

By the turn of the century Breitner was famous in the Netherlands, and had a highly successful retrospective exhibition at Arti et Amicitiae in Amsterdam (1901). He traveled frequently in the last decades of his life, visiting Paris, London, and Berlin, and he continued to take photographs. In 1909 he went to the United States as a member of the jury for the Carnegie International Exhibition in Pittsburgh.
But although Breitner exhibited abroad early on, his fame never crossed the borders of the Netherlands. At the time foreign interest was focused more on anecdotal and picturesque works; as time went by critics lost interest in Breitner, and the younger generation regarded impressionism as too superficial. By 1911 all the latest art movements arrived in the Netherlands one after another including cubism, futurism and expressionism. Breitner’s role as contemporary historical painter was finished.

Although Breitner kept his distance from younger generations and his work was judged more critically after 1900, he did not sink into oblivion. In 1917 a relief committee was set up to help him deal with financial problems, soon raising about 60,000 guilders.  Breitner certainly struggled with finances all his life, and a large proportion of his letters deal with money matters.
George Hendrik Breitner died on 5 June 1923 in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

 

 


References:

George Hendrik Breitner, General-books.net
Second Sight: The Photographs of George Hendrik Breitner
Rijksmuseum.nl
George Hendrik Breitner: the photographer

Posted in painting, photography | Tagged painting, photography | Leave a reply

Bounce to my other blog, Flesh & Relics.

Notice:

This is a collection of images found online. There are generally no links or credits to the original artists as they come from random sources.
If your work is on this blog and you want it credited or removed email me with the relevant information.


 

Popular Posts:

  • The Polaroid Amateur
  • Albert Arthur Allen: forgotten American nudes of the 1920’s.
  • Back in the C.C.C.P.- Soviet Amateurs & Propaganda.
  • Alfred Cheney Johnston & the Ziegfeld Girls
  • 0cbecf5b8c779c14a9672da395e2afb3 David Dubnitskiy; Ukraine
  • French Postcards I: The Mysteries of Grundworth
  • French Postcards II: The Collections of Monseiur X.
  • French Postcards III- The Studios Biederer and Ostra
  • Introducing the Ladybirds
  • Masters of Monochrome: Part I- Helmut Newton

archives

  • 2020
    • March 2020
  • 2018
    • August 2018
    • June 2018
    • April 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • January 2017
  • 2016
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
  • 2015
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
  • 2014
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
  • 2013
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
  • 2012
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
  • 2011
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
  • 2010
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010

Tag Cloud

1920's 1960's 1970's Acey Harper Al Goldstein Albert Arthur Allen Alfons Mucha Alphonse Mucha Ama Americana Anders Petersen Anita Berber architecture Art Nouveau Art of Rock Attila Sassy Banksy bar Beat Generation Bellocq Berlin Betty Broadbent body art bomb Brassai Bulgaria bullshit Cabaret Carlo Mollino catacombs Charles Wish Chicago Chuck Sperry Ciral's House of Tiki circus sideshow Clara Bow collage Communism Dada Daleks Dave Aho death deep south derbyblue Destino Diado Moriyama digital art Dope Rider Dr. Loo Dr. Seuss Drtikol Egon Schiele El Travo Collabo Elmer Batters Ephemeral art Eugenio Recuenco Flappers Flemish Art Fosco Maraini French Postcards Freud girl bands Glenn Beck glurge graffiti Graphic Art Grateful Dead Grundworth gun Harley Hedonists Hi-Fi hippie chicks Hunter S. Thompson HUSH Illustration Indian Janis Joplin Jean Marie Poumeyrol John Santerineross Jon Anderson Joshua Hedlund Jules De Bruycker Karel Teige KFC kudzu L'Âge d'Or Ladybirds Leanne ELROD Rodriguez lesbians LOA Louise Brooks Lowbrow Luca Rubbi Luis Buñuel magoo Marquette MI. Masons Masters of Monochrome Max Beckmann Merry Alpern Mexakitsch Mexico Michigan Mike Brodie Mixed Media New Orleans New York City Nixon nude nuns op Art Nude Opium Otto Dix Oz Magazine painting Paris personal shit Personal Work Peter Donnelly Peter Max Petr Flynt photography Picasso piercing Pierre Louÿs Pin-Ups Polaroid Polaroid Kid PoP Pop Art prints propoganda psychedelic art R.Crumb Roaring 20's Robots Russian Art Salvador Dali Saudek SCREW Magazine sculpture Shiko Soviet amateurs Soviet Monuments spam statistics Stephan Würth Storyville street art surrealists Tarot Tattoos Ted Coconis The Sun Between the Storms Thomas Hart Benton Tiki Tokyo Tom Huck Toulouse-Lautrec Tyson McAdoo Ukraine Un Chien Andalou vagina Vera Novak Veruschka Video vintage Vinz Feel Free Vivian de Milo Weimar Republic weird William Burroughs Yooper stuff Yoshiyuki Iwase Zbigniew Reszka Константин Фёдорович Богаевский
©2023 - TransverseAlchemy - Weaver Xtreme Theme
↑

 

Notice: This website contains nudity and other adult oriented content which may be considered offensive. You must be over 18 to enter.